September 4, 2000
The lung polyhedra were originally modelled after Gulrajani and Mailloux, but were modified to accomodate the CESI HHA series adult human heart model (described in the document HHA Bench Series Technical Specifications) without placing any Regional Dipoles too close to any lung polyhedral facets no matter how small a regional dipole exclusion radius is selected.
![]() |
Lung polyhedra of the THA Adult Torso Model, shown along with the
Regional Dipoles of the
HHA Adult Human Heart model.
Click on image to enlarge. |
Maximum facet size is set to 2.0 centimeters, yielding about 400 facets per lung.
The lung polyhedra are normally employed or unemployed in tandem, but simulations can be run with either lung removed.
This polyhedron is derived from the single torso shape in the torso Compound Shape, and is intended to model the torso surface when the torso extension paradigm of McFee and Rush is not being employed.
This polyhedron should not be employed if the inner or outer torso polyhedron is being employed.
The maximum facet size is set to 2.5 centimeters, yielding about 1300 facets.
These polyhedra are derived from the inner and outer torso shapes (respectively) in the torso Compound Shape, and are intended to model the torso surface when the torso extension paradigm of McFee and Rush is being employed.
These polyhedra should both be employed if the single torso polyhedron is unemployed.
The maximum facet size is set to 2.5 centimeters, yielding about 1200 facets on the inner torso polyhedron, and 1500 facets on the outer.
Reserved for internal use only.
Reserved for internal use only.
This Tissue Type is intended for modeling the low-conductivity lungs. The gross conductivity of this Tissue Type is used during computation of Surface Potential Transfer Coefficients if either or both lungs are employed.
The gross conductivity is set to .05 Siemens/meter after Lorange and Gulrajani.
This Tissue Type is intended for modeling the portions of the torso exclusive of the lungs, skeletal muscle layer, and intracavitary blood masses.
Its gross conductivity must be equal to the base torso conductivity specified in the Bench Window.
Its gross conductivity is set to .2 Siemens/meter after Lorange and Gulrajani.
This Tissue Type is intended for modeling the high-conductivity skeletal muscle layer when using the torso extension approach of McFee and Rush. Please see the document CESLab Technical Specifications for more information.
The gross conductivity is set to .125 Siemens/meter after Lorange and Gulrajani.
![]() |
Shape Editor view of the torso
Compound Shape 10 cm above the normal position
of the heart as seen from above. The tops of the lungs are nearly circular in this
presentation, and the attachment points of the right and left limb electrodes can be seen.
Click on image to enlarge. |
The lung shapes have been modified to fit the heart geometry and rotations as closely as possible, but should be considered very approximate.
Nine loci correspond with the nine standard electrodes, and are named accordingly. These loci serve to mark the desired positions of the associated electrodes. Note that, due to the discretization of the torso surface into polyhedral facets performed by CESLab for electrophysiological simulation, the positioning of electrodes is approximate.
Thus, electrode positioning is necessarily inexact. The greater the number of facets, the more exact the positioning. The number of facets for a given polyhedron may indirectly modified by adjusting the maximum facet size of the associated polyhedron: the smaller the maximum facet size, the more facets will be generated.
However, note that the resources (real time and Macintosh free memory) for computation of Surface Potential Transfer Coefficients increases according to the square of the number of facets.
To alter the heart position or rotation within the torso model, the user may edit the matrix named "Heart Transformation Matrix". Any desired series of rotations and translations may be specified.
Mailloux GE, Gulrajani RM (1982). Theoretical evaluation of the McFee and Frank vectorcardiographic lead systems using a numerical inhomogeneous torso model. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 29: 322-32.
McFee R, Rush S (1968). Qualitative effects of thoracic resistivity variations on the interpretation of electrocardiograms: the low resistance surface layer. Am Heart J 76: 48-61.
Pilkington TC, Plonsey R (1982). Engineering Contributions to Biophysical Electrocardiography. IEEE Press, New York. 2 Mark Stevans2;}¶|fi2STR ø„ˇˇ;}ôÿ